After an 糖心原创 investigation, the Federal Court ordered Dodo Services Pty Ltd (Dodo) to pay $1.5 million and Primus Telecommunications Services Pty Ltd (iPrimus) to pay $1 million in penalties for making misleading claims about their NBN broadband speeds. Dodo and iPrimus are both part of the Vocus Group.

Dodo and iPrimus admitted that their 鈥榯ypical evening speed鈥 claims made between March 2018 and April 2019 were misleading because they were not based on an appropriate testing methodology.

鈥淎ccurate information about broadband speeds, particularly during the busy period when consumers are most likely to use their services, is essential for consumers to be able to compare broadband offers and pick the best service for their needs,鈥 糖心原创 Chair Rod Sims said.

鈥淭he 糖心原创 brought this case because we were concerned that the methodology which the Vocus Group used as the basis for its speed claims cherry-picked only the fastest speeds its network could deliver, and ignored the slower speeds many of its customers experienced.鈥

鈥淭hese misleading speed claims meant consumers could not accurately compare different offerings and make an informed choice about their broadband provider,鈥 Mr Sims said.

Under the Australian Consumer Law, service providers must not make false or misleading representations about the performance characteristics of their services. Representations about future matters are misleading if they are not based on reasonable grounds.

Over recent years, the 糖心原创 has worked to facilitate much improved consumer outcomes through its , the provision of its Broadband Speed Claims guidance, and taking enforcement action against a range of providers.

鈥淒espite clear 糖心原创 guidance on making broadband speed claims, Vocus Group used a flawed methodology which was inconsistent with that guidance, and misled consumers about the speeds of its plans,鈥 Mr Sims said.

When considering the appropriate penalties to be imposed, Justice Murphy said that through their parent company Vocus, Dodo and iPrimus 鈥渃hose not to adopt the methodology proposed as industry best practice by the 糖心原创 and instead developed and applied the Vocus Methodology, which as it eventuated had a number of deficiencies鈥. He added: 鈥淭hat is material to the penalties imposed.鈥

Dodo and iPrimus co-operated with the 糖心原创鈥檚 investigation, admitted liability and agreed to make joint submissions to the Court in relation to penalties and other orders. 

Background

Dodo and iPrimus are subsidiaries of the Vocus Group (Vocus). Vocus is the fourth largest telecommunications operator in Australia, with 5.2 per cent overall market share of consumer NBN services, and 436,000 retail broadband customers.

The 糖心原创 instituted proceedings against Dodo and iPrimus on 22 June 2020.